Statistical Analysis. Part 2
We observed a statistically significant lower risk for distal colorectal adenoma among regular aspirin users com pared with nonregular users (multivariate-adjusted relative risk, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.66 to 0.84]). The effect was similar for both small (_1 cm in diameter) and large (_1 cm in diameter) adenomas and adenomas with tubular or villous histologic characteristics. Our results also remained unchanged when we evaluated the risk for new or incident adenoma on follow-up endoscopy in the subcohort of participants who were known to be adenoma free on a previous examination. We considered the possibility that differential rates of gastrointestinal bleeding might have influenced the observed findings. However, when we examined women who underwent endoscopy only for asymptomatic screening as well as those who underwent evaluation of occult or visible bleeding, we found a similar inverse association for regular aspirin use in each stratum. To assess long-term, consistent aspirin use more accurately, we focused our analyses on women who reported regular aspirin use on 2 and 3 consecutive biennial questionnaires before endoscopy and compared their incidence with that of women who were nonusers on 2 and 3 consecutive questionnaires, respectively. However, when adenoma risk was compared according to regular aspirin use reported on 1, 2, and 3 consecutive questionnaires, there did not seem to be any greater benefit among more consistent users. The apparent benefit associated with aspirin use was substantially greater with increasing dose. Compared with participants who took no aspirin, women who used the equivalent of 0.5 to 1.5 standard aspirin tablets per week experienced a modestly lower risk for adenoma (multivariate-adjusted relative risk, 0.80 [CI, 0.70 to 0.93]), whereas women who used more than 14 tablets per week experienced the greatest risk reduction (multivariateadjusted relative risk, 0.49 [CI, 0.36 to 0.65]; P _ 0.001 for trend). Since women who reported higher doses of aspirin use may have used the drug for longer periods, we further examined the influence of aspirin dose after additionally controlling for years of aspirin use. However, even after adjustment for duration of use, the effect of increasing aspirin dose remained strong (P _ 0.001 for trend).
We considered the possibility that the influence of aspirin dose was due to more consistent long-term aspirin use among women taking higher doses. Therefore, we repeated our analysis after restricting the cohort to the 11 857 participants who reported consistent aspirin use on 3 consecutive questionnaires before endoscopy and those who reported no use on 3 consecutive questionnaires. Among women who reported consistent aspirin use over 6 years, we continued to observe a statistically significant reduction in adenoma risk with increasing aspirin dose (P _ 0.001 for trend). Again, when adjustments were made for duration of use, increasing aspirin dose remained strongly predictive of lower adenoma risk (P _ 0.006 for trend).